This man is Anthony Lyons, an aviation broker of Griffith Avenue, who’s just been sentenced to six years in prison for sexual assault, with FIVE AND A HALF YEARS suspended. He’s also been instructed to pay his victim €75,000.
The assault took place 5 minutes from where I live and the perpetrator lives next door to my doctor. Anthony Lyons was walking home from my local pub, The Ivy House that night.
Is it me or does 6 months and a fine sound like a more apt sentence for a petty offense rather than rugby tackling a 27-year-old woman to the ground and attempting to rape her?
Lyons initially denied everything, but later admitted to the attack, saying that blood pressure medication mixed with cough syrup and Guinness provoked an ‘irresistable urge’ to attack the victim. The jury rejected this defense and convicted Lyons.
Sensible jury.
Using the ‘Twinkie defence’ on a sexual assault charge is ludicrous, there is no amount of Guinness or drugs, recreational or prescription, that justify attempting to rape someone. AGAIN this demeans men as slaves to their sexual ‘urges’. It’s no different than saying ‘her skirt was too short’.
What does everybody think? Does this sentence seem fitting?
VIVA LA JUSTICE











